| |
|
The
reason for these "quarterly" reports is that I
just cant keep up with the speed most of you read.
It is not unlikely that Ill only get one book done
in a month and now that my "day" job has me
doing less traveling, I dont go through audio books as often.
|
|
 |
|
A young Dr Carmen Nguyen,
against her better judgment, accepts the request from an emergency room
patient to look in on his birds while he convalesces in the latest
medical thriller from Robert Greer, Heat Shock.
Luke "Stone" Redstone's birds are fighting gamecocks. He fears someone
is trying to steal his winning birds. Carmen, a former medical
researcher, is intrigued by these unnaturally strong and aggressive
birds. She suspects the secret may lie in the uranium-rich soil in which
Stone trained his birds and in which may have been the cause of Stone's
current medical problem. When the birds go missing, and with the help of
Walter Rios, Stone's friend, Carmen investigates, finds herself being
stalked and shot at. She soon suspects the bird's value has little to do
with their fighting prowess. Why would someone commit murder to keep the
theft of fighting gamecocks a secret?
The
core of this story is a medical research thriller. "Heat shock" is a
protein that at normal levels prevents the activation of radical
protective genes from steering the growth of an organism to new
directions.
This
story isn't so much a message or warning shot, but more of a "What
if…." One of the "neat" things about medical thrillers is that it makes
me feel smarter than I really am. But the true genius is the writer that
weaves all these medical and scientific ideas in clear everyday English
without bogging you down with the jargon. It was Chapter 5 before the
first medical term appeared; a 3-word 90 wt; "ruptured brachial artery”.
"Ruptured" and "Artery" are pretty clear all by themselves and getting
right down to it, "Brachial" isn't too bad, but even if you don't know
what that is, any ruptured artery can't be a good thing. Greer doesn't
bother explaining it either and, you know what? He didn't need to. Quite
deft.
|
|
|
|
|
The
General's Daughter
by Nelson DeMille has Paul Brenner as an undercover cop in the US Army.
He is asked to take on the investigation of the daughter of the General
who has been murdered and, apparently, raped as she was staked,
spread-eagle, in the middle of the night on the rifle range. He is
teamed up with a rape specialist with whom he had a steamy affair (which
ended badly) during a previous duty assignment. The real suspense is
actually, more about these two than it is about the solution to the
murder investigation.
This story from 1992
was made into a film staring John Travolta as Brenner in 1999. I have to
say that this is one of the few times that I felt the film was better
than the book. There were some elements that were different in the film
and the book. Many times, a book made to a film will change things, even
the ending, like in The Bone Collector or Jaws (just two I
can recall immediately). Whether or not this film changed "who done it",
I won't say. I will say that the film seemed more of a suspense mystery
while book was more of a romantic tête-à-tête set with a murder
investigation as a backdrop.
|
 |
 |
|
Donna Andrews' You've Got Murder has
an utterly fascinating premise! An organization that develops
Artificial Intelligence Personalities (AIPs) has at least one that is
becoming "aware". We are introduced to Turing Hopper, sentient, and
suspicious over the absence of "her" creator, Zack. Suspecting fowl
play, Turing enlists the help of Maude and Tim (Employees where Turing
is installed) to be her, metaphorical, arms and legs to do some research
and gather clues to Zack's whereabouts. In the process, they uncover a
plot to … well, that would be a spoiler …. Needless to say, whatever the
plot and whoever is behind it, it is important enough that people, and
computers, nosing around could end up dead (or re-programmed). Being in
the computer biz myself, I can testify that Andrews' work does not take
a tremendous leap of faith (see below), but it will take some.
Furthermore, and probably more important, is that there is very little
computer jargon and what little there is, is explained to Tim (and,
vicariously, to the reader) who doesn't know that much about computers.
So you won't get blown away by computer-eze.
I
read an article back in the early nineties about the state of affairs
with Artificial Intelligence (AI). According to the guy being
interviewed, the problem with AI wasn't so much with overall design and
decision making routines, but rather that computers just didn't have any
"common sense". So his idea was to feed the program a bunch of, seemly,
non-computer related, common knowledge information, such as the story
lines and passages from famous books, films and speeches as well as some
philosophical factoids and common human interaction dialog. Their
program was called "Psych." At one point, one of the women feeding Psych
some information had said, "Intelligent things tend to like intelligent
things of the same type." And much later she said, "I like you, Psych."
The computer then responded, "Are you a program or am I a person?" I
still get chills up my spine when I think about that. I can't help but
wonder if Donna had read the same article.
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher Reich brings back Adam Chapel in The
Devil's Banker. A terrorist bombing of a Parisian apartment leaves
clues for the CIA that suggests more attacks and on US soil. To avert
another 9-11, they assemble a task force to follow the money. In the
lead is forensic accountant, Adam Chapel. Chapel, who lost four
colleagues in the Paris blast, is teamed up with British intelligence
agent Sarah Churchill. Together, the follow vast sums of money from bank
to bank and country to country. There is a great deal of suspense and
the setting of international terrorism is all too real and upsetting.
The money trail aspect of it was intriguing, but it just didn't hold my
attention. I didn't understand the significance of some of the money
manipulations, nor the point of them. Consequently, I found my attention
drifting. I think, however, if international suspense thrillers are your
"thing", you'll probably love this. The Adam Chapel character is a
returning character from previous Reich novels.
|
 |
 |
|
Cottonwood, from Scott Phillips, is an
episodic historical novel that has the feel a personal journal written
over 100 years ago. Told in first person by Bill Ogden, saloon keeper
and stereo picture photographer, we are introduced to the town of
Cottonwood, Kansas. Here, Bill is looking to making his fortune and
getting out of this one-horse town. He meets up with Marc Leval, a
wealthy Chicago developer who sees big things for Cottonwood and expects
that Bill's ambition will help him bring his plans to fruition.
The
book is basically a two-parter; the first in Cottonwood, Kansas in the
early 1870's and the second finds Bill in San Francisco in the early
1890's about to head back to Cottonwood after a, nearly, twenty year
absence. Though there is a story and one laced with the true-life crime of
The Bloody Benders, its calling card is Phillips' narrative and
the characters, but mostly his setting. At truly vivid account of an historical setting. After
just a few moments with this story, you'll want to check your shoes for
you may have stepped in!
|
|
|
|
|
C.J. Box's
Winterkill, explorers
Government/Anti-Government confrontations.
An anti-government, "survivalist" group moves into
town and takes up housekeeping in a local wilderness campsite. Almost
immediately, Joe finds the district supervisor's arrow-riddled body
pinned to a tree after he'd apparently slaughtered a large number of
elk. After the storm, evidence suggests the survivalists came in and
scarffed up the elk carcasses. Interesting they found out about the kill
so quickly. Maybe they had something to do with the supervisor's death.
At least, that is what the local establishment thinks. Joe isn't so
sure. But when his foster daughter is "kidnapped" by her natural mother
and taken to the compound, Joe thinks of it as a whole new ballgame. A
lot of thought fodder on this one. Does the government go too far in
trying enforce the law? Are the groups intentionally provoking the
establish into confrontation? True to form, you get to make up your own
mind, Joe just wants his little girl back. |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|